Buoyant Force, from the OnRamps Lab 6 worksheet. Float a wooden block, use Archimedes' principle to work out its mass, then check it against the scale. Every run gives new, realistic data.
Goal: use density, Archimedes' principle and the buoyant force to find the mass of a floating rectangular block experimentally, then compare it to the block's mass measured on a scale. You also have to measure the density of your liquid.
Key formulas
Fb = Wfluid = ρliquid Vsub gArchimedes: buoyant force equals the weight of liquid displaced.
Floating: Fb = mgNet force is zero, so buoyant force balances the block's weight.
mexp = ρliquid Vsubg cancels. In g and cm³ this gives grams directly.
ρ = m / VLiquid density from a graduated cylinder on the scale. 1 mL = 1 cm³.
Vsub = L × W × dRectangular block: d is how deep the bottom sits below the waterline.
Δx = s / √N, 95% CI = mean ± 2Δxs is the sample standard deviation (divide by N − 1).
Part 1Design your experiment
Pick a liquid and a way to find the submerged volume. On the real worksheet you write the materials, the set-up, the data to collect, sources of uncertainty and how you'll analyze it, plus an annotated sketch and numbered steps. Try writing yours before opening the sample.
Rubric check (Part 1 is worth 40 points)
Show a sample design for this set-up
Part 2aMeasure the liquid's density
Each trial: weigh the empty graduated cylinder, pour in some liquid, read the volume at the bottom of the meniscus, weigh again. Fill in the liquid's mass and its density. A box turns green when you're within 2%.
Part 2bFloat the block and find its mass
Scale reading of the dry block
Q195% confidence interval of the experimental mass
mean = Σxᵢ / Ns = √[Σ(xᵢ − mean)² / (N − 1)]Δx = s / √N95% CI = mean ± 2Δx
Quantity
Liquid density ρ (g/cm³)
Experimental mass (g)
The worksheet only asks for the mass CI; the density column is extra practice. Statistics checks allow 3%, since rounding adds up.
Q2Interpretation of findings
Does your measured (scale) mass fall within the 95% confidence interval from Q1? Explain what that means.
1. Is the scale mass inside the 95% CI of the experimental mass?
2. So what can you conclude?
Experimental 95% CI vs. scale mass
Experimental mass, 95% CIScale mass
3. Is your experimental average higher or lower than the scale mass, and what's a likely cause?
Show the worked solution for this dataShow a sample answer for Question 2